• Redex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Except that AMD doesn’t support HDMI 2.1 on Linux (not their fault to be fair, but still)

        • Redex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          I personally don’t have a need for it, but if someone has a 4K 120Hz TV or monitor without DisplayPort that they want to use as such, it’s kinda stupid that they can’t.

          • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            yeah, but that’s the fault of the HDMI standards group. AMD cards could only support HDMI 2.1 if they closed their driver down. I guess this can’t be fixed with a DP to HDMI adapter either, right?

            my opinion: displayport is superior, and if I have a HDMI-only screen with supposed 4k 120Hz support I treat it as false info.

      • naitro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Is that the case on mobile APUs as well? I’m pretty sure my laptop with 7840u does 4k120hz

    • bassomitron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s completely valid, I haven’t had issues on Linux myself with nvidia, but I know it’s definitely a thing for a lot of people.