• Englishgrinn@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    20 hours ago

    First, I’m going to heavily qualify this statement. Like, a lot. I have never served in any military capacity and I’m repeating something a member of the Canadian military told me, which could easily be wrong for 20 reasons.

    National Guardsman are similar to our “reservists” and are not paid when inactive. If additional troops who were already trained but not active, we’re then activated, that would account for additional costs.

    So yeah, massive grain of salt but you asked and someone gave me a reasonable answer that seemed to fit. I have done no fact checking, though.

    • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Thanks for the explanation. My understanding was that in the US, the national guard also had regular troops, not just reservists, but maybe they did call the reservists despite that or I misunderstood/misremembered.

      Regardless, I still think an article explicitly about the cost of the deployment giving no information on this is absurd.