A new Ipsos in the UK poll reveals that the left-wing political party recently founded by former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn and MP Zarah Sultana could capture a significant segment of the British electorate, particularly among younger voters and those who supported the Labour and Green parties in the 2024 General Election.

Overall, 20% of British adults say they would be ‘very’ or ‘fairly likely’ to consider voting for a new left-wing party. This figure, however, masks a sharp generational divide. A third (33%) of those aged 16-34 would consider voting for the new party, a figure that drops to 22% among 35-54s and just 9% among those aged 55 and over.

The potential for this new party to disrupt the existing political landscape is most evident in its appeal to voters of other left-leaning parties. One-third (33%) of those who voted Labour in 2024 and 43% of 2024 Green party voters would consider lending their vote to a Corbyn-Sultana-led party.
[…]
An alliance between the [Corbyn/Sultana Party and the Greens] would be a potent force, with 31% of all Britons saying they would consider voting for a united ticket. This rises to a majority (52%) among 16-34s and includes nearly half (46%) of 2024 Labour voters.

  • katy ✨@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    24 hours ago

    jeremy corbyn can’t even speak out and condemn the terf making policy and planning conventions for his party…

    • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      15 hours ago

      What party exactly. Because he was banned for standing for Labour in 2023. So has not been a member or had any authority to speak on labours behalf throughout this government.

      As for the new your party. Where are you seeing any comments about teams rights so far.

      Sounds like your just looking for reasons to blame him for right wing labours bullshit with 0 actual link in the events.

      • flamingos-cant (hopepunk arc)@feddit.ukOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I mean, most of the MPs in the Independent Alliance that are making up the initial members of this party are fairly socially conservative. Ayoub Khan is anti same-sex marriage, three members of the IA (Adnan Hussain, Iqbal Mohamed, Ayoub Khan) voted against the decimalisation of abortion and here’s Adnan Hussain reposting a Rishi Sunak TikTok video on trans people:

        Screenshot from Facebook of a Adnan Hussain post that contains a video of Rishi Sunak with the subtitles reading: "A man is a man, a woman is a woman".

        • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          And if you have read 2 mins about the plans for the new party.

          You will know MPs and even leadership will not be the power that decides such policies.

          So again you have. 0 grounds to question the party ATM. As it’s whole design is to be membership controlled. Unlike labour currently is.

            • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Then the membership will make that rule.

              Corbyn is not a leader yet. Nor are any MPs party MPs yet hence the whole your party temp name.

              No one in the party has any right to an opinion without the membership. Because that is the whole point of the party.

              You can dislike it. But you do not get to say it stands for or against anything untill autumn. When it’s members choose.

              • flamingos-cant (hopepunk arc)@feddit.ukOPM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                But you do not get to say it stands for or against anything untill autumn

                And yet Corbyn and Sultana have made strong statements about this party’s prospective position on things like nationalisation, Gaza, welfare, a wealth tax, housing, and pollution. It’s a choice not to include LGBT rights in that, one that reflects badly on them.

                • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  41 minutes ago

                  They have not. They have not even declared themselves leaders.

                  They have made proposals as the what the party may vote for. But have made it extremely clear that it is a democratic party start to finish.

                  They are founders who have opinions. And clearly indicate that is all theyare in interviews. They have indicated they would be happy to act as joint leaders if chosen. But again leave it to the party members.

                  Just like any other member expressing a personal opinion is entirely allowed. But both parties have made it clear I. Interviews they are only their personnel opinion and ideal. Not the parties.

        • katy ✨@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          shockat adam, too - and Jeremy Corbyn flat out refuses to come out and say transphobia has no place in the party.