There’s a stark difference in success rates between companies that purchase AI tools from vendors and those that build them internally.

Despite the rush to integrate powerful new models, about 5% of AI pilot programs achieve rapid revenue acceleration; the vast majority stall, delivering little to no measurable impact on P&L.

The research—based on 150 interviews with leaders, a survey of 350 employees, and an analysis of 300 public AI deployments—paints a clear divide between success stories and stalled projects.

  • leisesprecher@feddit.org
    21·
    3 days ago

    I’m sorry, but that’s the worst possible conclusion you can get from that paragraph.

    Again, think your argument to the end. What would not fall under AI in your world? If A* counts, then literally everything with a simple ‘if’ statement would also count. That’s delusional.

    Do actually read the article and the articles linked. Are you really, really implying that a simple math equation, that can be solved by a handful transistors and capacitors if need be, is doing something “typically associated with human intelligence”? Really?

    • MrLLM@ani.socialEnglish
      12·
      3 days ago

      Like, are you seriously saying that everyone in Wikipedia is wrong but you? You’re the only one delusional here.

      Believe or not, a bunch of if statements can mimic intelligent behavior, again, not like it’s intelligent, it looks like which is the whole point (that you obviously missed out)

      • leisesprecher@feddit.org
        11·
        3 days ago

        No, I’m saying you’re wrong in your understanding of Wikipedia.

        Also, I did not miss anything out, your self defined definition is simply so broad that it’s meaningless. Again, what is not AI following your definition? An if statement does not mimic intelligence, especially not human intelligence.