• ampersandrew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Boy, it was frustrating to see Thor completely misrepresent the position of the campaign. It wasn’t “vague enough to also include live service games”; it purposely includes them.

    • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, that’s why he says it’s stupid. It seems like he’s fine with the idea of removing DRM that makes single player games unplayable but forcing devs to make online multiplayer games playable forever is ridiculous.

      • Archelon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Only if you think the campaign means that companies must pay for the multiplayer servers forever which Ross has said on MULTIPLE occasions is not reasonable and not what he wants.

        Giving players the tools to host their own servers or adding LAN functionality, though? That’s entirely reasonable seeing as that’s how multiplayer always used to work. I mean, there are still plenty of Unreal Tournament servers active today without any involvement from the developer in decades.

        Especially since, if this initiative works, developers will make games with that functionality in mind.

      • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        To clarify, your position is it’s ridiculous, or you’re stating that his position is that it’s ridiculous?

        • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          My position is it’s ridiculous. I agree with Thor. Saying all games must exist forever is too vague because I don’t think all games should be forced to exist forever.

          • Cowboy_Dude@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Per the official Stop Killing Games FAQ: https://www.stopkillinggames.com/faq (apologies if formatting ends up looking weird)

            Q: Aren’t you asking companies to support games forever? Isn’t that unrealistic?

            A: No, we are not asking that at all. We are in favor of publishers ending support for a game whenever they choose. What we are asking for is that they implement an end-of-life plan to modify or patch the game so that it can run on customer systems with no further support from the company being necessary. We agree it is unrealistic to expect companies to support games indefinitely and do not advocate for that in any way. Additionally, there are already real-world examples of publishers ending support for online-only games in a responsible way, such as:

            ‘Gran Turismo Sport’ published by Sony ‘Knockout City’ published by Velan Studios ‘Mega Man X DiVE’ published by Capcom ‘Scrolls / Caller’s Bane’ published by Mojang AB ‘Duelyst’ published by Bandai Namco Entertainment etc.

            • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              That’s fine for single player games but modifying some massive MMO so that someone can host it on a laptop is literally impossible. This language applies to everything. EVE Online, WoW, FFXIV, all of it would need to be able to run on someone’s home computer when they’re purposefully built from the ground up to work on massive servers?

              • ParetoOptimalDev@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                This comment betrays a technical misunderstanding.

                Not only is it possible, but designing games from the ground up in this way makes it easier for developers to test and make robust software.

              • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t think there’s any language in this petition that says it must be hosted on a laptop. The server binary, with a reasonable expectation that someone with documentation, the hardware, and the know-how to use it, would be enough.