cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/33487836

By MEE staff
Published date: 21 July 2025 21:11 BST

The New York lawmaker voted against an amendment by Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene last week that sought to block $500m in Congress’ annual defence spending bill for Israel’s Iron Dome programme.

Fellow Democrats Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar [as well as Democrats Al Green of Texas, Summer Lee of Pennsylvania and Republican Thomas Massie of Kentucky - PL] had supported Taylor Greene’s amendment, which eventually lost in a 422-6 vote.

In a post on X on Saturday, Ocasio-Cortez claimed that Greene’s amendment did “nothing to cut off offensive aid to Israel nor end the flow of US munitions being used in Gaza”.

  • 3abas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    61
    ·
    10 hours ago

    AOC is a beautifully blooming neoliberal, and it’s time for all to stop worshipping her. She had proven over and over again that she’ll vote for neo-liberal interests above all and justify it by wrapping it with a bow of humanity.

    Think of all the American lives that could be saved with that money before you justify spending on the iron dome to protect foreigners from the consequences of committing Genocide. AOC is not your friend.

      • JohnnyFlapHoleSeed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        9 hours ago

        There are two types of people who use the term neo liberal, people spreading Russian propaganda, and people who consume it

        • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 hour ago

          The term for the predominant political and economic theory implemented by American and European powers since the 1980s is just Russian propaganda now?

          What the hell else is supposed to be used instead?

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      10 hours ago

      She’s not a neo liberal… Maybe she’ll become a liberal at worst

      I believe she’s a good person, I believe she’s a true blue progressive…I just think she has terrible political instincts. It seems like she’s making backroom deals that don’t benefit her positions or even herself

      I’m not mad, I’m just disappointed. And I don’t think Bernie has been a good influence

      We need fighters, and it’s been too long since she actually fought. I still think she’ll be part of the solution, but she’s not panning out into what I hoped she’d be

      • 3abas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I believe she’s a good person, I believe she’s a true blue progressive

        Everything you typed after this implies the opposite. It’s painful to accept that someone you admired might no longer be who you thought they were. But the sooner you let go of that attachment, the clearer things become. She is not your friend. You do not join the Democratic Party to fight it from within. You join it to become part of its machinery.

        Look at her record and measure it against her rhetoric. She voted to fund the Iron Dome in 2021 and then cried on the House floor. That was not courage. That was shame. She has now voted against cutting funding to Israel’s military while bombs are falling on Gaza. She condemns genocide and then votes to fund it. That is not strategy. That is betrayal.

        She avoids confrontation with her party even when that party is enabling mass death. She speaks of justice, then backs imperial budgets. She delays, reframes, and pacifies while Palestinians are being erased. Her presence is soothing for liberals and neutralizing for movements. She functions as a release valve. She gives you a reason to believe in a system that should be dismantled.

        You said she might be making backroom deals that do not benefit her or her ideals. That is what co-optation looks like. It does not require corruption. It only requires surrender. It happens when staying in the room becomes more important than changing what the room represents.

        It is not that she is inactive. It is that she actively helps preserve a violent status quo. That makes her dangerous in a different way. Not because she is cruel, but because she is trusted.

        Being disappointed is honest. But if you continue to hold onto the belief that she is still part of the solution, you will miss what she has already become. She is no longer a fighter. She is now a barrier.