• CubitOom@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    This is not a depiction of a village, this is what happens when the village no longer exists and everyone has to live in isolation from any social safety nets. Or to put it another way, Neoliberalism.

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I do think there is value in pointing out how even in the most horrid conditions humans have the capacity to be nice to each other

      • CubitOom@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        I don’t think I understand. Who is being nice in this picture? The manager for letting her employee work while they care for her daughter in a dangerous work environment prone to spills, slips, cuts, burns and other risks?

        Don’t you think there should be a better solution?

      • drolex@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Wow you’re right. I’ll have 2 neoliberalisms please. Gonna max out those shareholder values 💪

        • CubitOom@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Would you like to add genocide to that with just a few purchases from platforms owned by literal white supremacists?

    • kemsat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Nah, in a village you’d see kids at work with parents sometimes too. Usually you’d have some kind of daycare situation, but sometimes that’s not an option.

      I can totally see a village shop where the owner is there with a baby, and the kid kinda grows up in the shop.

      The difference is that they’d own the shop tho…

      • CubitOom@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        We aren’t talking about rasing a kid in a literal village within a Neoliberal society. “It takes a village” is an idiom about how the entire community should help to properly raise a child.

        The saying emphasizes that a child’s upbringing is a communal effort involving many different people and groups, from parents to teachers to neighbors and grandparents.

        The whole idea underscores the belief that the collective involvement of a community is essential in achieving a certain goal or completing a task, like raising a kid.

        Essentially, it’s a friendly reminder that asking for help with hard things is okay because many hands make light work.

        https://grammarist.com/idiom/it-takes-a-village/

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Y’all. CEO pay ain’t the fucking problem.

      McDonald’s CEO Chris Kempczinski made $19,200,000 in compensation last year. (That includes bonuses and stock.)

      Divide that out among McDonald’s 200,000 employees, ya got a whopping $96 per year raise. Or, a $.05 hourly raise.

      Just imagine the fucking outrage if Kempczinski came out and said, “I’m taking $0 pay this year and giving it back to the workers that make it happen! You all get a nickel raise!” LOL, y’all would shit live kittens.

      I get it. People see this fucker dragging in more money, in a single year, than they’ll make in their whole life and say, “I want a piece of that!” Again, your piece as a McDonalds employee isn’t 100 bucks a year. You’re not seeing the scale here. McDonalds brought in $30,000,000,000 in revenue last year. CEO pay is .064% of that. (Somebody check my math. Worked my ass off today. Great day! But I’m tired boss.)

      I can do this all day long with publicly available numbers. Save your ire for the real problems with capitalism. Screaming about CEO pay is ignorant at best, childish at worst.

      • ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Maybe not THE problem but sure as hell part of the problem. Don’t forget, salary is only 1/3 of their offer. They get more……and more. Sounds like more can be the reinvestment to employees salary. Horizontal business, not vertical.

      • YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Okay, I’m confused. I think your point is that CEO compensation isn’t enough to make a significant difference in pay, but you seem to be completely ignoring the fact that there is no way that dude works hundreds+ times harder than the person in the picture, and that the culture that allows that to happen is not healthy. As far as I can tell, no one is going around saying “the only thing that needs to change is how much we pay CEOs.”

        • Lemminary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          He’s getting paid like his ideas are revolutionary when in reality it’s clever at best and sitting on the inertia of the corporation. Like, I get the dude has brains but that paycheck is not proportional. And this goes for every CEO out there.

          And before I get the “CEOs are there to take the fall” I say when was the last time a CEO has really taken a fall? I see them get hired again elsewhere after fucking up bad. The only one I remember was that Pharma company’s false promises but because the CEO was a psycho. Otherwise they look like pedo priests being shuttled between congregations when their diddling gets found out without consequences.

      • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        An extra $8/month could make a big difference in some folks’ lives, judging by the number of folks in my social circles that need a bit of help to make ends meet at the end of the month.

        • YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Just for some perspective, if you bought 2 gallons of water and 3 pounds of rice or beans a month with that $8 (rough estimate based on local prices) after a year you’d have a stockpile of 24 gallons of water and 36 pounds of food, which could possibly be a weeks worth for many families. A week of rations set aside for disaster prep could mean survival in an emergency.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Leaving aside, for the moment, that side benefits make the total much higher, that you think it’s about just the CEO proves both that you don’t understand the conversation and inherently accept the lie that they’re worth that much pay in the first place.

      • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Now might be a good time to clarify that the problem with CEO pay is not the direct cost of the compensation itself. The problem is the perverse incentive structure of market manipulation and tax engineering where the CEO can increase their bonus by destroying value. This is a negative sum game - what the employees and customers lose is many times greater than what the C-Suite and shareholders gain.

  • Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    The implication is she was how old when she got pregnant? Yikes. Can we talk about the $.00 Chocolate chip cookie

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    What are these comments? This isn’t good at all.

    That kid not being in daycare is costing the economy probably 1k a month in child care fees. Not to mention the worker is probably being less efficient.

    Imagine if you worked really hard to open some McDonald’s branches and the workers all started to bring their kids in. Workers these days have no sense of respect.