Salt Lake City police say a demonstrator who was shot at the city's “No Kings” protest has died and that the bullet that killed him appears to have been fired by one of the demonstration's peacekeepers.

A man who was believed to be part of a peacekeeping team for the “No Kings” protest in Salt Lake City shot at a person who was brandishing a rifle at demonstrators, striking both the rifleman and a bystander who later died at the hospital, authorities said Sunday.

Police took the alleged rifleman, Arturo Gamboa, 24, into custody Saturday evening on a murder charge, Salt Lake City Police Chief Brian Redd said at a Sunday news conference. The bystander was Arthur Folasa Ah Loo, 39, a fashion designer from Samoa.

Detectives don’t yet know why Gamboa pulled out a rifle or ran from the peacekeepers, but they accused him of creating the dangerous situation that led to Ah Loo’s death. The Associated Press did not immediately find an attorney listed for Gamboa or contact information for his family in public records.

  • snooggums@lemmy.worldEnglish
    171·
    1 day ago

    Parker is with the organizers, and she confirmed that they were part of the safety team. Redd is with the police, and is relaying the word of the organizers but hedging the wording for PR purposes.

    “Our safety team did as best as they could in a situation that is extremely sad and extremely scary,” said Parker.

    It really couldn’t be more clear.

    • nexguy@lemmy.world
      28·
      23 hours ago

      It’s not clear. So it’s the person who is in the green vest and fired a trained police officer or not? “Safety team” is a meaningless term that could mean guy with gun license up to cop.

      • zaph@sh.itjust.works
        11·
        22 hours ago

        So it’s the person who is in the green vest and fired a trained police officer or not?

        Not. Peacekeepers are civilians doing cop’s jobs because cops have no requirements to protect and serve.

    • Glide@lemmy.ca
      23·
      1 day ago

      I did miss that bit in the full article, so fair enough. It certainly could be more clear though: they’re burying the lede pretty badly by opening with the wording that insinuates we don’t know.