Summary

Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez condemned Donald Trump and Elon Musk at a packed Arizona rally, accusing them of harming working-class Americans and promoting oligarchy.

Sanders denounced corporate CEOs as “major criminals” exploiting workers, while Ocasio-Cortez called for stronger Democratic leadership.

Rallygoers urged Ocasio-Cortez to challenge Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer after he supported a Republican funding bill.

The rally, part of Sanders’ “Stop Oligarchy” tour, follows criticism of the Democratic Party’s weak response to Trump’s agenda and features further events in Colorado and Arizona.

  • S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    From here the outside ot really feels that you need to start another party now. Like nice rally and all of that but the dnc has been screwing you over every fuckin time.
    Edit: Or a representative parliament system? That winner takes all shit shouldn’t be…

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      Or a representative parliament system?

      Oh ok we’ll get right on that

      Edit: it just doesn’t really help that these discussions always devolve into comments about “we have to get rid of FPTP” and all that. Yeah, no shit. There’s zero chance of that happening in this country at this time. Not without a complete breakdown of the country.

    • rockhard@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      That is because both GOP and DEM are corporatist parties. They will not cater to working class people because those people aren’t the ones throwing the most money at them. Left wing populism is nothing more than a tankie wet dream since citizens united.

    • maniclucky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      22 hours ago

      First past the post ensures that any party that tries to splinter off dooms both themselves and the party from which they splintered.

      What needs to happen is the democrats need to get tea partied.

      • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        20 hours ago

        At this point there’s no risk since the Democrats can’t win anyway. Might as well deal with a couple split elections while the transition happens because Republicans win even if you don’t

          • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Splinter implies a small breakaway group.

            Amputate implies removing a part of the body that is harmful.

            Who is really in power in the Democrats and how did they get there?

                • maniclucky@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  In the US, yes. In other countries (also Alaska and Maine somewhat), the voting system (ranked choice voting, proportional representation, etc) allows for many smaller parties to form. Because no one ends up with 50+% of the vote, these groups have to come together to get things done. With first past the post (which is winner take all, which is heinously stupid), small parties cannot meaningfully form because they cannot possibly get enough votes to get into office.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      The real solution is to change the party in the primaries.

      As flawed as the DNC is, starting a new party will split the non-Republican vote and guarantee the GOP sweeps.

      “Change the system!” Yeah - the last Constitutional ammendment that was ratified was in 1992 and had been introduced in the Washington administration.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          In 2000, if just 1% of the people who voted for Nader in Florida had voted for Gore instead of throwing away their vote on a third-party, we never would have had Bush as President.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Buddy we don’t even have elections anymore. The voting system is no longer a relevant target.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Starting a new party just guarantees Republicans win in landslides.

      We need to do to the Democrats, what maga did to Republicans. Primary the old fuckers with young progressive candidates.

      • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        Just like how the Tea Party completely destroyed Republicans OH WAIT that’s not what happened at all. Republicans moved to the right to stay relevant and here we are.

        A new popular party will force Democrats to either move to the left or become irrelevant. It’s exactly what we need.