Note: Btw I don’t endorse this ruling. I just thought it was important news to share

  • artiman@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    WTF how is natural gas green… I can understand nuclear but natural gas is quite insane to call green

    • MBech@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      You see, it has the word “natural” in its name. We all know that everything natural is good right?

      • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        This is basically to allow projects to use fossil gas for a bit, until hydrogen or bio methane is available for the project. It takes years to built something like this and 2035 is only a decade away. That is very different from fossil gas is green period.

  • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago
    • Coal is 820 to 1050 kg of CO2e per Megawatt Hour

    • Natural gas is 480 kg CO2e per Megawatt Hour

    • Nuclear is 20 to 50 kg CO2e per megawatt-hour

    • Wind is 25 grams of CO2 per Megawatt Hour.

    • Solar is 20-50 grams of CO2 per Megawatt Hour.

    (Numbers should not be considered accurate but relative scale is representative)

    The biggest issue here is that without a significant increase in battery capacity a stable renewable grid is impossible without Natural Gas powered generation.

        • solariplex@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Sure, I get that. Dams often involve lots of concrete, which emits insane CO2 during production; and dams devastates large areas of nature (or human settlements).

          Just felt it weird to state that natural gas is required for a stable renewable power grid, when hydro exists. Wherever hydro is possible, it’s almost certainly better than natural gas in most aspects.

  • 0xtero@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Well that was easy. Now just rule that burning oil and coal is actually just totes OK and we’re done! First in the world, completely sustainable!

    Saving the planet has never been this easy!

  • Cosmoooooooo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Natural Gas is a fossil fuel. Natural Gas is a fossil fuel. Natural Gas is a fossil fuel.

    Who’s selling Natural Gas? Russia. Why would anyone declassify it as a greenhouse gas? So they can buy it from Russia. Who would do such a thing? Nazis that want to make money off of nazi Russia, and support its wars.

  • amelore@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    While it’s dumb to call it green, it’s fine and very useful to use it as part of a transition towards renewables. That’s what this is actually about, countries being allowed to use part of the funds for the energy transition for gas.