“If confirmed, I will work to restore confidence and integrity to the Department of Justice — and each of its components,” Pam Bondi vowed during her confirmation hearing in January. “Under my watch, the partisan weaponization of the Department of Justice will end. America must have one tier of justice for all.”

But since her confirmation on February 4, Attorney General Pam Bondi has done exactly the opposite, weaponizing the DOJ against Trump’s political enemies and withdrawing criminal investigations of his allies. The tone was set on her first full day, when she fired off an all-staff memo threatening to fire anyone who raised ethical or legal objections to advancing frivolous arguments in court.

Literal Mob Rule:

The Civil Rights Division, which once protected victims of discrimination, is helmed by yet another former Trump lawyer, Harmeet Dhillon, a culture warrior who brags about outsourcing her prosecutorial discretion to Twitter randos. Per the Wall Street Journal: Harmeet Dhillon, head of the civil-rights division at the Justice Department, wakes up around 6 a.m. and begins her workday scrolling through X, searching for claims of discrimination. A lot of them, Dhillon said, regard universities. After spotting “a list of new horrors,” she said, “I text my deputies, and we assign cases, and we get cranking.”

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Garland waited until late November of 2022 to appoint a special counsel, after Democrats in Congress had lost their subpoena power, and put a guy with a broken leg on the case. Smith’s office focused on the Mar-a-Lago documents case, which floundered for years, before his very appointment as special counsel was rejected by a Trump appointee Judge (which they recognized was a problem going into the case clung to the venue regardless).

      To my knowledge, Smith didn’t pursue any third party financiers or media figures responsible for organizing the J6 riot. His primary role was to fumble the Mar-a-Lago documents case. He did get a Grand Jury to indict Trump for inciting a riot, under a more-friendly DC venue, in August of 2023. But Smith never managed to bring the case to trial in the subsequent year and a half. The case was scuttled as soon as the election was over.

          • Optional@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            You mean in the year and a half he had two of the biggest cases in American legal history? One of them with the most obstructionist judge possible?

            You’re right, the DoJ totally failed the bourgeois. Or was failed by the bourgeois. Or whatever.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              You mean in the year and a half he had two of the biggest cases in American legal history?

              Sam Bankman-Fried went from “investigated” to “in jail” inside nine months. The entire OJ Simpson Trial only lasted eight months. The time between the murder, the failed criminal case, and the successful civil suit, and the conviction was less than three years. Trump’s only been in office for six months and he’s already taken 20 different cases before the SCOTUS.

              One of them with the most obstructionist judge possible?

              Seems like an experienced veteran DOJ attorney would have known to file the case in a more friendly venue. But I guess a man that loses 78% of his court cases is just too damned slick for the Garland DOJ.

              You’re right, the DoJ totally failed the bourgeois. Or was failed by the bourgeois. Or whatever.

              Almost as though they were set up to lose by an incompetent chief executive and his worthless cronies.

              • Optional@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Golly you seem to know a lot about the federal prosecutors office. Maybe you could run for something and tell everyone to get it right so there will never be any mistakes anymore.

                • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Maybe you could run for something

                  Sadly, I don’t have any billionaires willing to put up seven digits to stack my campaign.

                  But hey, better luck with whatever slop the next election cycle feeds you, I guess.